President-elect Trump has started naming his potential appointees and, if you’re a thinking man with a half a brain, they’re terrifying. It’s like a clown car opened up behind the White House and he’s just taking them in the order they’re getting out. The one that this missive touches on is his CIA appointee who has stated that using encryption “may itself be a red flag.” Seriously, Mr. Pompeo? Or, using encryption is because those of us using it prefer to keep the government out of our business as our founding fathers intended and not this Orwellian ridiculousness we’re being asked to pretend is the new normal. Hell no. Using encryption doesn’t make me a terrorist any more than buying Sudaphed makes me a criminal drug user.
So, without further ado, may I present my plan. Well, less of a plan and more of an idea that I hope takes off because….well…screw Mr. Pompeo.
Basic Network Connection
Basically, if you’re running internet from Time Warner, Comcast or any of the large providers, you’re compromised. Sorry – it’s just how it is. Thankfully, there are things you can do about this. There are VPNs, proxies and other variations on that theme. I’ve used a LOT of these and I have some recommendations.
First and foremost VPNs. VPN stands for Virtual Private Network and the simplest explanation is you are logging to their network and using their network to navigate the web and it sends the data back to you. The theory, there, is that the only IP address visible is the one assigned when you log into the VPN – your own network IP address is not exposed. So, think of it as a tunnel under a lake. The only thing the world knows about it the opening from the other side of the lake from where you entered the tunnel. So, there is some debate as to which are better and if there are any good free ones.
I currently have four installed on my system that I use. Each has its own set of pros and cons.
Let’s start with the one I use the least – SecurityKISS. I’ve used it off and on for over a year and it’s pretty solid. I get slightly reduced bandwidth speeds, but that’s to be expected. The only real downside to this particular VPN is that it has a bandwidth usage limitation of 300MB, if I remember correctly, and that’s per day, I believe, and resets every 24 hours. Now, it looks like they’ve simplified it since I started using and that’s not necessarily a bad thing. It uses a client you can download and have pricing options that range from free to just under 90 euros a year. Of course, each price tier opens up more possible server connections as well as features.
Another one that I use that is a little more complicated to set up is VPNGate / SoftEther VPN. The one thing I like about this is that once you get it set up, you load a list of potential servers and it displays the uptime, bandwidth and how many users are currently connected.
There are four ways to connect, each with their pros and cons and the VPNGate website has instructions to set up each method including one to use the OpenVPN client if you already have that in order to use other VPNs. It’s also open source, so you won’t be restricted in your usage for using the “free” option, as they’re all free.
I started using Windscribe after I was doing research and really liked what I saw. I liked it even more when I didn’t notice any discernable slowdown when using the VPN – even running a speedtest confirmed it. Now, what’s interesting about this VPN is that there are ways, free ways, to increase your monthly usage cap.
My current cap is at 15GB per month and, thus far, when I am going back and forth between VPNs, this has been more than enough. There are two pricing options and they’re basically free and paying the yearly charge of ~$90 all at once or monthly. I like the free option and was willing to do things like tweet a micro-testimonial to get an addition 5GB per month.
One of the interesting things to note is that not only can you use this on your Windows or MacOS system, but also your android device or even your router if it has been DD-WRT or Tomato flashed.
I’ve started using VPNBook a lot more, of late. About the only things it disallows are pop connections and torrenting (except for, it would seem, the European servers). It does pretty much everything else, is fast and pretty easy.
As you see in the graphic, there, it supports a number of servers in a number of locations. It tend to use the US1 and US2, though I’ll use the Canadian ones if I’m feeling frisky. The only “inconvenience” is that the password to log into the VPN is provided by VPNBook on the web site. I pinned the page in my browser, so it’s not too bad. It’s pretty simple to set up and the instructions are clear and concise. VPNBook supports OpenVPN so is usable on Windows, MacOS, Linux, iPad and Android devices. It also supports PPTP, but recommends the OpenVPN method.
“The Onion Router” or TOR can fall under “browser” as well, and that’s where I will discuss it more. At this point, you just need to know that it is a distributed network designed to provide anonymity. For the most part, it does, but my recommendation is to fire up a VPN and then load your TOR browser.
E-Mail is the most easily siphoned window into your personal lives. There are some ways to mitigate this – webmail is, in theory one way, though it’s not any more or less secure than a standalone client if it’s not set up properly. So – what do I use? I’ve tried a ton of email clients over the years and the one I’ve settled on isn’t necessarily the one I’d recommend for end-to-end encrypted emails.
Confidant Mail might be a hard sell because it’s basically uprooting your existing emails (even though you keep your old email address) and putting them into a completely encrypted system. It’s not simplest to set up and seems to rely on you convincing everyone you communicate with to install and use Confidant Mail, as well. Since it’s a standalone application it doesn’t run the same risks as do webmail or even standard pop/smtp-based email clients that employ message encryption. It had a page dedicated to why it’s better than normal or even encrypted email. It generates a public key via GPG when you set up the program, initially, and once that’s done you can upload the key to the servers so that people who are subsequently installing the program will be able to search for, find, and add you to their contact list. I recommend checking it out, but something that I’ve had a bit of a problem over the 20 years I’ve tried using PGP is convincing my friends and family to also use PGP.
Anything with “Making the three-letter agencies cry” in the tag-line is something worth looking into. The only thing with Sigaint is that you really need to access it through your TOR browser. They have a clearnet address, as well, but it mainly serves to tell you to seek them out via TOR. It’s a webmail client, so there are inherent risks, but they are quite open and honest, telling you not to trust them and to encrypt your emails. Now, there is a “pro” option, as well, that for $32 for life, will allow you to use multiple protocols (pop3s, smtps, imaps), upgrade your email storage from 50MB to 1GB, full disk encryption, and a slew of other things to ensure your anonymity. With the pro upgrade, you can also use an external email client – it says it’s been tested with Thunderbird, Claws and K9 Mail. The free version is still very usable, though they recommend PGP-encrypting your emails before you send them, and I’ve had nary a hitch using it. You basically get two email addresses – the clearnet version and the onion-specific version. They both go to the same place, it just depends on the origin. If you want no one to know who your are, this is the way to go.
A fairly new service arrived earlier this year. Basically, ProtonMail provides end-to-end encryption, a two-step authentication method (log into Proton Mail, then log into your mailbox), as well as the ability to send emails that will, in essence, self-destruct after a set amount of time. It’s hosted in Switzerland and their servers never see plaintext anything – all the emails stored on the server are encrypted. This has three cost/service plans where the free service provides you with a single address, a limit of 150 messages per day and 500MB storage. The Plus tier is 48 euros per year and gives you a bit more while the Visionary tier gives you 20GB storage, 10 custom domains with 50 unique emails addresses and no limit on sending/receiving emails. It’s 288 euros per year. One interesting feature is that you can enable authentication logs which will tell you when your mailbox was accessed and from what IP address. This is a solid choice and I’ve not had a problem with ProtonMail – and you can download the android app to access it from your phone or tablet, as well.
I’m not sure what to do with this, since it’s more or less a service solution rather than a product solution, so you have several choices as to how it protects your email. It looks decent enough, but also, to me, looks like there are several holes along the chain that could be problematic, but that’s just me worrying about anything that is not encrypted leaving your system and relying on something “out there” to do it for you. It also looks geared towards small business, with a subscription system, so I’m not sure how useful it will be to an end user who wishes to employ it. So, there you go – another option.
I have many browsers. I want to try them all, see which ones work the best for my needs. I will touch on them and let you decide for yourself if they will work for you, your privacy, your security.
Yes, Chrome. Mostly, this is because of the pile of extensions you can plug into it to give you whatever level of protection you wish. I use the following plugins to great success:
- AdBlock Plus (ad blocker…)
- Anonymous Communication (secure chat client)
- BitDefender Quickscan (real-time antivirus checking of web pages)
- Block Site (offending site? “Welcome to my kill filter, sucker.”)
- Do Not Track (cuts down on sites abilities to track you)
- DotVPN (VPN internal to the browser)
- Ghostery (makes it easy to see who’s trying to track you)
- NetCraft Extension (site information and phishing protection)
- OneTab (not security, but bloody useful – collapses all tabs to a list on one page)
- Performance Analyzer (measures the performance of web pages/sites)
- Poper Blocker (my favorite popup blocker)
- Request Maker (Log, edit and send HTTP requests)
- Rubber Glove (removes common browser tracking ‘fingerprints.’)
Now, these come at the expense of performance, occasionally, and RAM usage, most of the time, but I haven’t been hit by any drive-by malware for a LONG time. When used with a VPN (one of the ones listed above or just the DotVPN), it offers reasonable protection from snooping.
After I spent a large amount of time getting the beta of FireFox up and running and customized to my liking, it decided to update to a newer version and wiped out not only all of my bookmarks, but my extensions, as well. As you can imagine, that made me a touch salty, which is why I don’t use FireFox as often as I used to. That said, I have a couple of addons/extensions that make FireFox more usable for me.
- AdBlock Plus (ad blocker…)
- uBlock Origin (an efficient blocker that is pretty customizable)
As I mentioned, though, I don’t use it much, anymore. So, these two are by no means the extent of the addons or extensions out there, but they’re the only ones I’ve put back since being forced to start from scratch.
They feel that your privacy is yours and yours alone. It’s a solid browser and does just about everything I need. The big things to take into consideration, here, are that
- Private Browsing is *always on*
- it automatically sends the “do not track” message to websites
- it blocks all third party trackers and cookies
- one-click on/off proxying which hides your IP address and encrypts your data (gets REALLY slow, sometimes, especially when inside a VPN tunnel)
- it searches through its own proxy when obscures your searches from outside “eyes”
So, basically, it has just about everything you need, right out of the gate, to be private and mostly safe out there in the wilds of the internet. I mentioned that it gets slow inside of a VPN. A lot of things get slow inside a VPN tunnel, so it’s not a condemnation as much as a factual statement – in this case, however, you know why and can appreciate why your data is taking a bit of time to find its way back to you. It does break some sites, of course, but has a “Quick compatibility umbrella” which expands and lets you pick and choose which safety mechanisms you are using in an attempt to return compatibility. I use this browser a lot.
Opera was my first “go-to” browser after my FireFox kerfuffle. It’s a solid browser and one that I’ve used off and on since it was initially released back in the land before webkit. The one thing I miss is the ability to set how many data connections you wanted to hammer a site with to improve performance. I think it’s still in there, but the bottom line is that, really, most connections are fast enough that it’s really fairly unnecessary unless you want to inadvertently instigate your own miniature Denial of Service attack which, by the way, web masters love.
I only have a few extensions and they are “the usual subjects,” AdBlock Plus, and that’s pretty much the only ones for security. “Why,” you may ask. Well, it has a nifty feature whereby you can toggle, on a tab-to-tab basis, the built-in VPN connectivity, which is through SurfEasy. For the most part, it’s fast and can be routed through numerous countries for added protection.
It’s main goal is to limit the trackers and ads that slow down your browsing while at the same time protecting your private data. It’s a good browser and I actually do find it faster when going to normally ad-laden sites. Of course, part of that, too, is that I use a custom hosts file that nips most of that in the bud, but still, you can tell the difference. It defaults to trying to run everything through https-everywhere, which is good.
The bottom line, for me, with this browser is that it’s in its infancy and each release makes it better. It’s a solid browser, now, but doesn’t have everything to keep you off the grid…yet.
After the big three (Chrome, FireFox and Opera) all flaked out in their own ways, I spent a lot of time looking for a browser that didn’t drive me nuts. I test drove this for a few days and those days have turned into months. I like it because it’s fast, does everything I want, and doesn’t do dumb stuff. One of the selling points is that almost every aspect of the browser, and therefore your browsing experience, is customizable. It’s not as secure as the others, but can take extensions to fix that, I’ve just been too lazy to, recently. Well…when I want secure, I’ve got how many other browsers to choose from?
“Elegant, clean and completely open source,” this browser is build with the security / penetration tester in mind. The landing page has a slew of links ranging from your everyday to the Hackery section and a link directly to Shodan. One of the things that stands out about this browser is the number of tools built in. There are a lot. I suppose I could list them out, but that’s pretty much what their web site is for – it discusses each one and does a better job than I could. Honestly, it’s more for site testing than security, but as it takes FireFox extensions, you can add whatever you need, in this regard. It is, nice, however, to have the ability to see what headers are being passed on to you and allowing you to edit them on the fly. That’s good stuff, right there.
This browser actually kind of tries to be a one-stop shop for you, providing a browser with many interesting security features like an encrypted password manager, right-click re-enabler, a cloud-based note/document storage area (1GB/free), and a provider of anonymous emailboxes. All this translates to a web browser that is pretty solid for information gathering while you’re browsing the web. It also defaults to duckduckgo as its search engine which, while it doesn’t return 1.5 zillion results like Google, it also returns mainly those things that have something to do with what you’ve searched for and not a bunch of ad placement crap. I haven’t used it a huge amount because, well…nine browsers makes “equal time” hard. That said, it seems to do well with ridiculously pop-up ridden sites like firstrowsports.eu, on which I watch hockey from the Ukraine and rugby from New Zealand and it plays the video with no fuss, no muss. Not a security related feature, to be sure, but one that’s welcome, nonetheless.
Developed by the save folks who develop FossaMail (which is what I use), this browser just received an overhaul. This overhaul brought it up to “today’s browser standards” and in the process broke a couple of the nice security extensions it had going for it. This will probably be fixed, in the near future, but fear not – important security extensions remain: AdBlock Latitude, Encrypted Web, and Secret Agent. What this means is that you’re not going to see the majority of the ads out there, you’re going to be in HTTPS as much as possible and it will rotate the “User Agent” as not to leave a reliable fingerprint of the browser you’re using. This is a good thing. It will also alert you if a site tries to hijack requests and tries to redirect it to a different web site. It will tell you the how, the who and the potential why: “Your web surfing may be subject to surveillance.” It’s a solid browser with a highly customizable landing page which is nice. Check it out, but also check out the FireFox-based extensions that you can add to make it as secure as your paranoia desires. Is it paranoia if you know it’s happening? At any rate…
As discussed, previously, this is the browser that works with the TOR network and will allow you to see deep/dark web sites and those sites with the .onion suffix. It allows you to switch TOR circuits – or paths through the TOR network – in order to maintain anonymity if you feel that the current route/path/exit node has been compromised. Do remember that while the TOR model allows your data to be encrypted inside the TOR network, once your data leaves an exit node and goes to a site, the data in between the exit node and site is not encrypted by the TOR network, so continuing to use an extension like HTTPS Everywhere is always a good idea. Now, what I do, for what it’s worth, is to fire up a VPN and then launch the TOR browser. This way the TOR network connections are working within an already obfuscated network tunnel. While not foolproof, it does increase the challenge for prying eyes/agencies. While navigating through Onion-land is a bit more arduous and a bit slower, it is still a much safer alternative to bopping around in clearweb land. There is also a “hardened” version that may be a version or so behind the currently available TOR browser, but has been modified to provide a lot more security. I use this one almost exclusively.
You’ll notice there a browser missing. Most folks in the IT world understand why it’s missing. Perhaps you don’t. Perhaps you love IE Edge. Here’s the thing – it’s a screen door on a submarine, security-wise. That’s pretty much what you need to know. Any of the browsers above would be a much better choice when it comes to keep your data from “the man.” In the interest of fairness, I will say, simply, that when I tried to “harden” IE, it broke. I can no longer use it to browse the internet and it has become, inexplicably, the default PDF reader despite Acrobat Reader being installed. It now, like Hodor, can only say one thing:
This is where Pomeo is poking the bear. I’m a firm believer in 1st, 4th and 5th Amendment rights as well as a strong heaping helping of “nunya.” What’s “nunya,” you say? If you grew up in the south, you know this is a rather sassy way of saying, “None of your business.” Really, that’s how I feel about all aspects of my digital life. I used to have an attitude of “fine, look around – I’ve got nothing to hide!” What changed? Well, for one thing, the Patriot Act. Almost completely unconstitutional in its reach and just a wake up call that it doesn’t matter what the laws say, the government will find a way to wiggle around them. Then came the hoo-hah about the iPhone in the San Bernadino terrorist case where some dunderhead tried to brute force *guess* the password to the iCloud and iPhone accounts and effectively wiped both clean. Somehow, this was seen as Apple’s fault and so there was the huge floofle about how Apple should create a backdoor for law enforcement and Apple basically said, “Up yours,” as well they should. What killed me about this, tangentially, was that if you search for “iPhone 5 unlocking/decrypting,” there are enough links that the FBI could have had it done in under 5 business days and for right around $150. At any rate, as soon as that story hit the news, I hopped into my Android settings menu and encrypted the heck out of my phone. You want anything? You’re going to have to work for it, or at least lay out some cash. Even though I’m not doing anything “wrong,” I’m not in any way shape or form going to make this easy for anyone who wants my data without a fight…or encryption key.
I absolutely encourage drive encryption. Every Virtual Machine I create is encrypted and has to be decrypted, using the proper password, to even mount. Once past that, the drive is encrypted and, finally, the user directories are encrypted with a different password for each user. Seems like it could be considered overkill, doesn’t it? Well, so what? I think I mentioned not making it easy.
This is a very useful – and free – encryption program geared towards drive encryption, whether it is full disc encryption, partial disk, containers (encrypted files that act like drives but aren’t outwardly visible as such) and can even hide these encrypted volumes. It’s free, actively maintained and based off of the TrueCrypt software package that was used by a multitude of corporate entities, including mine (TrueCrypt, not VeraCrypt) – and it (VeraCrypt) is SO much faster and less flaky than McAffee’s “Endpoint” software, in my experience. You can select many encryption protocols and – and this is a wonderful “and” – you can even wrap them three deep, meaning your volume will first be encrypted with AES-256, then it will be encrypted with Blowfish, or TwoFish, and finally, on top of these two encryptions, it will encrypt a third time using Serpent, for example. That’s my personal choice, but there are several combinations from which to choose. This flexibility makes it exceedingly useful and, more importantly, pretty intuitive to use. I recommend this to the moon and back for keeping your sensitive bits protected.
My experience with this product has been largely negative, but that might have to do with how it was implemented, so I’m disinclined to just dismiss it out of hand. It’s only one of two in the list that costs anything, so you’ll need to take that into consideration. I do know some folks who feel safer purchasing a commercial product – especially an expensive one – because they feel it’s more secure. This could be. I couldn’t tell you. I just know that post-encryption, I’ve had better luck with VeraCrypt. Honestly, the only trouble I have had with Endpoint is that it will suddenly and out of the blue simply disavow any knowledge of my passcode to decrypt the drive in order to use it. This is frustrating in itself, but the process to recover it is not only a titanic pain, but – here’s the thing that throws giant red flags for me – with the recovery software, you are given a long series of numbers that will allow you to reset the password and, therefore, decrypt the drive. Now, in a corporate environment – and one thing I do actually appreciate about the seemingly overly complex method for doing this that my employer uses – you can only access this recovery module after logging into the web portal, going to the “recover endpoint encryption” link and clicking it, then entering your credentials in, again, including a secret question, and only after satisfying this step will it allow you to embark on the rest of the journey. Now, on the plus side, the price isn’t a deterrent. Ranging from ~$20 for individual users to ~$5K for an enterprise license, it’s really not all that bad, comparatively. That said, I trust VeraCrypt more. Why? Just because, really. While the aforementioned folks feel more comfortable with a for-profit product, I prefer a product written by someone(s) whose only skin in the game is reputation.
I’ve never used Bitlocker. It used to be only available on the Ultimate editions of Windows7 and, I believe 8. I think it’s standard, now. If it’s not, it should be. At any rate, it functions very much like the above two solutions when it comes to encrypting entire drives. You can encrypt your system (boot) drive with relative ease and, at this point in the game, I recommend that course of action.
Now, I am pretty sure I haven’t used this, but I might have in a previous incarnation – I honestly don’t remember. That said, from reading the literature and implementation documents, it seems like it’s on par with McAffee’s offering and does allow full-disk encryption. I also boasts using PGP (Pretty Good Privacy) for it’s encryption of choice. The company seems to be positioning this solution towards the enterprise customer, but you can get the Endpoint Encryption in a single license for $189. So, again, I’ve not worked with it, so I can’t say one way or another if it’s the right product for you or your needs. I’m just letting you know it’s out there and, frankly, the more encryption the better.
On-the-Fly / Individual file / Text Encryption
There are a long ton of solutions, here. I’m going to focus on ones I’ve used and/or recommend.
The granddaddy of all public key encryption, this has going through a slew of changes, purchases, open source projects and version. It’s been entertaining to watch, if not a little frustrating to keep up with. Basically, the majority of things I’ll be discussing fall under this category, in some way or another.
PGP, Inc. was purchases by Symantec, and so is included in the aforementioned Endpoint security package. I’m mainly putting this here for completeness’ sake. This isn’t to be confused with PGP Corporation. Oh, wait…yes it is. This is PGP if you want to pay for it.
Standardized in the mists of history (1997), OpenPGP is available for all platforms, including iOS and Android. This is pretty much the standard and everything derives from this. It’s free. It’s mostly easy to set up – the hardest part is thinking of a suitably secure password. Their site has email encryption solutions, keyservers, and even a section for developers discussing signing their projects. The email section provides a long ton of options/solutions. Check them out.
For historical purposes, only, I include the “international” version of the original PGP software and should be considered exceedingly outdated – it supports Windows 3.1/95/98/NT as well as the Amiga and OS/2. So, why would I include it? Because it’s fascinating to see how far we’ve come, really. I love digging around in this stuff, so, I figured I’d share.
This is what I use. Take that for what it’s worth…I use it. That doesn’t mean you need to use it or should use it. I just like the setup of GPG4Win and it’s easy for me to work with. The binary releases, should you not feel like downloading the code and compiling (./configure ./make ./make install), support Windows, Linux, MacOS, Android, OpenVMS, and RISC OS. Integrated into the Windows shell, it makes encrypting/signing/decrypting documents, other files, directories and even drives painfully simple. I recommend it.
I’m including this not just because they have their own OpenPGP solution for you, but a they also offer secure file transfer, which is nothing to sneeze at. Now, while the OpenPGP product is free, the Diplomat File Transfer product is not. It’s pricey, but when you look at what it does – securing file transfers, either P2P, FTP, FTPS and SFTP, as well as encrypting those files that are transferred with the private keys, meaning only the sender and the recipient can open the file(s) sent. That’s pretty hoss. This service will cost you, with the “basic” version *starting at* $595, the “standard edition” starting at $2,995 all the way up to the Enterprise version with the terrifying “Call for pricing.” Still – if you’re worried about industrial espionage, how much is your data worth to you?
Again…make these folks work for it, where “these folks” can be, basically, anyone who wants to access your drive who isn’t you and, especially, without permission. There are more solutions out there, but this should provide a good starting point.
I know a lot of people that use either their own server or services like Dropbox to store files “in the cloud.” There’s Dropbox, Mega.nz, and a whole slew of others, but they all share one thing: they’re searchable by the companies that set them up and in that light, anything subversive or plain illegal in your file storage area can be found and you can endure anything from irritation all the way to outright pain. That doesn’t sound fun. So, let me recommend a few. I’ve been using Keep2Share, of late. It functions much like Dropbox, but I haven’t read any missives, recently, talking about k2c routinely scrubbing through user accounts looking for violations. Let’s look at some other options, shall we?
This is a product that looks a LOT like what were talking about with Diplomat. There are differences, of course, but as you get into the paid subscription versions, one of the big selling points is the end-to-end encrypted file transfer. That said, the free version offers this, as well, just without as many bells, whistles and safeguards. The free version features the ability to secure one cloud account, up to two devices from which to upload and save data, and Whisply integration which, for those who don’t speak weird corporate software naming practices, is their end-to-end file transfer encryption which will allow you to send out an unlimited number of links to the files you store there and these other folks don’t have to be boxcryptor users. It also has a portable installation if you’re not wanting to, or can’t, install it one your system.
Aiming to not be a full service, encrypted cloud storage provider, it’s not free, but offers a lot of features. Their claim, also, is that it would take 1,000 years to crack the encryption they use. I wonder if that will change with quantum computing? At any rate, they offer a couple of tiers of service, with the personal level providing a terabyte of storage, access from 10 devices, password protected links and extensive file permission settings for file sharing. The personal subscription is $30 per month, so $360 per year. For small business and enterprise, it’s considerably more outlay, but is less per user. Again, the enterprise model has the scary “Custom pricing,” which probably just means customizable for your business, but I still like seeing everything out in front of me. One interesting thing that I like a lot is that it has a section for developers, offering a SDK to allow the end-to-end encryption to be integrated into your application. The tagline, “No more data breaches” sounds good to me. You have to request access, but I’m thinking that a software development company could benefit greatly from being able to tell clients/customers how secure their data will be.
LaCie’s solution was one I was going to discuss, but upon hopping to the site for more information, I got this:
<h2>Our services aren't available right now</h2><p>We're working to restore all services as soon as possible. Please check back soon.</p>Ref A: C544C6B0F1F84F22A420DB3DC53148B5 Ref B: F4B412192C8F55313E7D91E98DB04966 Ref C: Fri Nov 25 08:03:07 2016 PST”
This looks like another encrypted cloud service, though, it’s positioning itself more as a security layer on top of cloud storage. Honestly, if the files are encrypted, I’m not sure I care how you get them there. Well, that’s not entirely true, but you get the picture. The personal version is free and for non-commercial use. You get roughly the same features as on the company/enterprise-centric models, but without the longer audit trail, Active Directory integration and collaboration tools. Now, there’s free, then there is the per-user cost for each level: $10. The only difference is the number of users, at a minimum, that you are required to have: 25 for small business, 250 for medium business and 2,500 for enterprise-level.
Honestly, I’m running out of steam. For cloud storage alternatives beyond what I’ve laid out, here, I recommend this article. It goes into greater depth than I have been and gives you pros and cons in a concise manner. Concision has never been my strong suit.
Long story short, if you want to keep the government/hackers/pranking friends/ex-spouses out of your data/email/what-have-you, you need to secure it. There are also ways to secure what you already have, for example, in Yahoo or Gmail.
There’s an option for most webmail services to use two-factor authentication. Use it. You’ll be glad you did, especially when reports come out stating that Yahoo knew about data breaches as early as 2014 (and didn’t do anything until much later), and the recent Gmail breach. If it’s difficult for YOU, it’s going to be that much more difficult for anyone else.
Also, don’t use fingerprint or simple-pattern unlocking on your phones. While a long PIN is a pain in the butt for you, just think how much of a pain it will be for someone who doesn’t *know* the PIN.
Stop using common passwords. While “ihatemyjob” is funny in ads, it’s horribly insecure and will take even an average computer a few minutes, if that, to crack. Even throwing in a “!” at the end will delay the “crackening.” That said, I’m a big fan of using symbols and numbers. “Ih4t3myj0b!” will be that much more difficult to crack.
Above all, just don’t make it easy. The more layers of security, the better. The heftier the encryption, the better. It doesn’t make you a terrorist, it makes you a pragmatist. Remember – This isn’t about hackers, anymore. It’s about our government.